Rehabs in United Kingdom

LROAS 1.0.0, edition 2026-10-01

5 clinics

  1. 1st of 5 in United Kingdom

    Source: Nightingale Hospital

    London, United Kingdom

    Nightingale Hospital

    Rank #2The clinic's position by public score in this edition.Public score 58The sum of the ten criterion scores, from 10 to 100, using evidence anyone can check, including the clinic's own pages as self-declared statements.TiedAnother clinic has the same public score and shares this rank.
    Public evidenceThe headline number is the public score, not the extended score., LROAS 1.0.0

    DiscretionShared setting

    AssessedThe clinic has a full assessment in this edition: all ten criteria scored, each with its reasoning, its sources with capture dates, and the gaps we could not close.
    PricingPrice on request"Price on request" means the clinic publishes no specific residential price.
    View profile
  2. 2nd of 5 in United Kingdom

    Source: Harbor London

    London, United Kingdom

    Harbor London

    Rank #11The clinic's position by public score in this edition.Public score 48The sum of the ten criterion scores, from 10 to 100, using evidence anyone can check, including the clinic's own pages as self-declared statements.TiedAnother clinic has the same public score and shares this rank.
    Public evidenceThe headline number is the public score, not the extended score., LROAS 1.0.0

    DiscretionOne client per residence

    AssessedThe clinic has a full assessment in this edition: all ten criteria scored, each with its reasoning, its sources with capture dates, and the gaps we could not close.
    Prices from"Prices from" shows the lowest price the clinic publishes on its own site, as published, with its as-of date.
    GBP 69,995/ week
    Residential Level 1
    View profile
  3. 3rd of 5 in United Kingdom

    Source: Castle Craig Hospital

    West Linton, United Kingdom

    Castle Craig Hospital

    Rank #14The clinic's position by public score in this edition.Public score 46The sum of the ten criterion scores, from 10 to 100, using evidence anyone can check, including the clinic's own pages as self-declared statements.TiedAnother clinic has the same public score and shares this rank.
    Public evidenceThe headline number is the public score, not the extended score., LROAS 1.0.0

    DiscretionShared setting

    AssessedThe clinic has a full assessment in this edition: all ten criteria scored, each with its reasoning, its sources with capture dates, and the gaps we could not close.
    PricingPrice on request"Price on request" means the clinic publishes no specific residential price.
    View profile
  4. 4th of 5 in United Kingdom

    Source: PROMIS Clinics (PROMIS Recovery Centre)

    London, United Kingdom

    PROMIS Clinics (PROMIS Recovery Centre)

    Rank #42The clinic's position by public score in this edition.Public score 41The sum of the ten criterion scores, from 10 to 100, using evidence anyone can check, including the clinic's own pages as self-declared statements.TiedAnother clinic has the same public score and shares this rank.
    Public evidenceThe headline number is the public score, not the extended score., LROAS 1.0.0

    DiscretionOne-to-one therapy, shared site

    AssessedThe clinic has a full assessment in this edition: all ten criteria scored, each with its reasoning, its sources with capture dates, and the gaps we could not close.
    PricingPrice on request"Price on request" means the clinic publishes no specific residential price.
    View profile
  5. 5th of 5 in United Kingdom

    Source: The Cottage (Priory, Life Works)

    Woking, United Kingdom

    The Cottage (Priory, Life Works)

    Rank #67The clinic's position by public score in this edition.Public score 36The sum of the ten criterion scores, from 10 to 100, using evidence anyone can check, including the clinic's own pages as self-declared statements.TiedAnother clinic has the same public score and shares this rank.
    Public evidenceThe headline number is the public score, not the extended score., LROAS 1.0.0

    DiscretionOne client per residence

    AssessedThe clinic has a full assessment in this edition: all ten criteria scored, each with its reasoning, its sources with capture dates, and the gaps we could not close.
    PricingPrice on request"Price on request" means the clinic publishes no specific residential price.
    View profile

Showing 1 to 5 of 5 clinics

LROAS 1.0.0, edition 2026-10-01

Filters

Clear all

Privacy and media law: United Kingdom

As of 2026-10-05.

Medical confidentiality

Information a patient shares in confidence may not be disclosed without consent or another legal justification, a duty built up by the courts rather than set out in a statute [1]. Doctors, including those in private practice, must also follow GMC confidentiality guidance, and serious or persistent failure to follow it puts their registration at risk [2].

Health data

Under the UK GDPR, data about physical or mental health is "special category" data and may only be processed under one of the conditions in Article 9 [3]. The Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 keeps that protection and requires organisations to acknowledge data complaints within 30 days [4].

Photographs and harassment

There is no general image right, but misuse of private information is actionable. In Campbell v MGN, the House of Lords held (3 to 2) that publishing covert photographs of a model leaving a Narcotics Anonymous meeting, with details of her treatment, was unlawful and restored her damages award [5][6]. Harassment can lead to damages and an injunction [7]. Scotland has its own harassment provisions, including non-harassment orders [8].

Stopping publication

Courts stop publication before trial only if the claimant is likely to win [9]. In PJS v News Group, the Supreme Court kept a privacy injunction in place even though the story was already online abroad, finding damages inadequate [10]. The Editors' Code that IPSO enforces protects physical and mental health (clause 2), bars persistent pursuit (clause 3) and restricts journalists in hospitals (clause 8), with public-interest exceptions [11].

What this means in practice

UK law offers strong remedies after a leak, and sometimes before publication, but it cannot stop someone taking a picture. How a clinic handles arrivals, residences and staff discipline matters as much as the law.

Sources

  1. "Confidentiality policy" (common law duty of confidentiality), NHS England. https://www.england.nhs.uk/long-read/confidentiality-policy/ (accessed 2026-10-05; content confirmed via search extract, page body did not render). Supporting: "Section 2: The common law of confidentiality and consent", NHS England Digital, https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/looking-after-information/data-security-and-information-governance/codes-of-practice-for-handling-information-in-health-and-care/a-guide-to-confidentiality-in-health-and-social-care/hscic-guide-to-confidentiality-references/section-2 (accessed 2026-10-05).
  2. "Confidentiality: good practice in handling patient information", General Medical Council. https://www.gmc-uk.org/cdn/documents/gmc-guidance-for-doctors---confidentiality-good-practice-in-handling-patient-information----70080105.pdf and https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/the-professional-standards/confidentiality/about-this-guidance (accessed 2026-10-05).
  3. "What is special category data?", Information Commissioner's Office. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/lawful-basis/special-category-data/what-is-special-category-data/ (accessed 2026-10-05).
  4. "The Data (Use and Access) Act 2025: what does it mean for organisations?", Information Commissioner's Office. https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/what-we-do/legislation-we-cover/data-use-and-access-act-2025/the-data-use-and-access-act-2025-what-does-it-mean-for-organisations/ (accessed 2026-10-05).
  5. Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22, House of Lords judgment of 6 May 2004. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200304/ldjudgmt/jd040506/campbe-1.htm (accessed 2026-10-05).
  6. "MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom: Naomi Campbell v. the Tabloid Press", Strasbourg Observers (Ghent University Human Rights Centre and Hasselt University; secondary, university). https://strasbourgobservers.com/2011/03/14/mgn-limited-v-the-united-kingdom-naomi-cambpell-v-the-tabloid-press/ (accessed 2026-10-05).
  7. Protection from Harassment Act 1997, section 3 (civil remedy, England and Wales). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1997/40/section/3 (accessed 2026-10-05).
  8. Protection from Harassment Act 1997, section 8 (Scotland). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1997/40/section/8 (accessed 2026-10-05).
  9. Human Rights Act 1998, section 12. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/section/12 (accessed 2026-10-05).
  10. PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26, UK Supreme Court, 19 May 2016. https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2016-0080 (accessed 2026-10-05). Reasoning confirmed via case analysis, Global Freedom of Expression, Columbia University (secondary, university): https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/cases/pjs-v-news-group-newspapers-ltd-2016-uksc-26 (accessed 2026-10-05).
  11. Editors' Code of Practice (version in force from 1 January 2025), Editors' Code of Practice Committee. https://www.editorscode.org.uk/the_code.php (accessed 2026-10-05). IPSO clause page: https://www.ipso.co.uk/clause/8-hospitals (accessed 2026-10-05).