Silvia Cardenas Gonzalez
Centre Manager and Head of Operations
leadership
Marbella,
A private Marbella residence selling six ascending care tiers, where sole occupancy is the top package rather than the standing model.
Oasis Premium Recovery is a private residence in the gated Sierra Blanca area of Marbella, presented by its operator as a house rather than a hospital. Treatment is sold in six ascending tiers, from a seven day Essential Care package up to an Ultimate Bespoke package and a separately sold One Client at a Time tier that gives a single client the whole villa. That sixth tier is the clearest evidence on the public record that sole occupancy is a purchase rather than the standing model. The entry tier is advertised with a shared twin room and a shared bathroom, and group therapies appear among the inclusions of the residential packages, even though other pages on the same site state that no group therapy is run. Every residential package includes a full medical examination and one to one counselling, and the clinic states that all medical services are delivered by third party licensed professionals selected by its management team. The confidentiality protocol is unusually detailed for the sector: enquiries logged under initials, the address released only after booking, unbranded transfers to a private entrance, sound dampened rooms, staff confidentiality contracts and encrypted records. No operating company, owner or founding date is published, no accreditation is claimed, and no health authorisation could be confirmed, because the national register of health centres could not be retrieved when it was checked in September 2026.
The clinic's own team page names roughly 37 people with their roles, across clinical, wellness, hospitality and support work.
Centre Manager and Head of Operations
leadership
Lead Therapist and Client Relations Manager
clinical
Psychiatrist, Mental Health and Eating Disorders Specialist
medicine
General Practitioner and Substance Misuse Specialist
medicine
Preventive Health and Longevity Specialist
medicine
Health Psychology Professional
psychology
Psychologist Professional
psychology
Head of Admissions and Psychotherapist
psychology
Nutritionist
nutrition
Physiotherapy Professional
physiotherapy
Client Support Manager
support
No registration number, board certification, training institution or academic affiliation is published for any named person.
From seven days
EUR 8,000 per week as recorded in September 2026
The entry tier. A private seven day residential programme with a shared twin room and shared bathroom, three individual counselling sessions, a full medical examination and diagnosis by a licensed physician, group therapies and excursions, full board and transfers. It carries no dedicated detox pathway, and a live-in counsellor is an add-on.
Typically 28 days
EUR 10,000 per week as recorded in September 2026
An expanded individual schedule with a broader modality mix drawing on cognitive behavioural therapy, dialectical behaviour therapy, eye movement therapy and trauma work, alongside yoga, massage, sound therapy and the hydrotherapy circuit. Accommodation is a private bedroom with a shared bathroom, the stated difference from the entry tier. Three individual counselling sessions are included.
Typically 28 days
EUR 15,000 per week as recorded in September 2026
Built around burnout, executive stress and functional recovery alongside any primary diagnosis, with a private en-suite room, five individual counselling sessions, scheduling flexibility, secure connectivity for continued work and personal training. Detox is described as medically supervised when clinically indicated. Group therapies, excursions and cultural outings are listed inclusions.
Typically 28 days
EUR 20,000 per week as recorded in September 2026
A fully individualised programme in a private two-room suite with the widest modality access and five individual counselling sessions. Intake adds a pharmacogenetic panel, a nutritional assessment and a microgenetic test, along with a virtual reality attention deficit diagnosis, and the tier includes a clinical nutritionist with a bespoke chef-prepared meal plan.
Typically 28 days
EUR 35,000 per week as recorded in September 2026
The top published tier. A private suite with a live-in counsellor present throughout the stay, five individual counselling sessions, the full diagnostic suite, a clinical nutritionist with bespoke chef-prepared meals, and a personalised written aftercare plan with follow-up contact from the clinical team at no additional charge.
-
-
Sole occupancy of a private luxury villa for the whole stay, with one dedicated team, no other clients in the residence at any time, no shared therapeutic environment, unlimited one to one psychotherapy with a named lead therapist, confidentiality undertakings signed by all staff and encrypted clinical communications. Sold separately from the five residential tiers.
Individualised
Included in the residential tiers
Covers anorexia, bulimia, binge eating, orthorexia and food addiction. Meal support advances at a tolerable pace in anorexia, structured snacks and a simple plate model are used in binge eating disorder, and dietary variety is restored in orthorexia. Independent dietetic professionals are brought in where clinically required.
As clinically indicated
Included in the residential tiers above the entry tier
Detox and tapering are described as coordinated discreetly through licensed medical professionals rather than delivered in-house, with hospital coordination arranged where a higher level of support is needed. The entry tier carries no dedicated detox pathway. No detox unit, nursing rota or withdrawal protocol is published, so the arrangements should be established in writing before admission.
-
Included in the weekly fee
An aftercare plan and relapse prevention are included in every residential package, with follow-up contact from the clinical team at no additional charge, ongoing online check-ins, coordination with independent licensed professionals for medication needs, and individual, group or family-oriented support. The clinic describes it as lifetime, which is not a defined period.
-
-
A private apartment with post-residential support, listed on the programmes page alongside the six residential tiers, with five individual and therapy sessions. It is the only step-down option the clinic publishes within its own operation.
| Programme | Price | Period | As of | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Essential Care Package, weekly rate | EUR 8,000 | week | Prices as of 2026-09-17 | |
| Deluxe Package, weekly rate | EUR 10,000 | week | Prices as of 2026-09-17 | |
| Executive Package, weekly rate | EUR 15,000 | week | Prices as of 2026-09-17 | |
| Premium Tailored Package, weekly rate | EUR 20,000 | week | Prices as of 2026-09-17 | |
| Ultimate Bespoke Package, weekly rate | EUR 35,000 | week | Prices as of 2026-09-17 |
The verifiable review base is six reviews on one independent platform. Trustpilot shows 4.2 out of 5 from six reviews on a claimed profile, all of them five-star, posted between 29 January 2026 and 13 July 2026 and labelled unprompted, with no recent history of the company asking for reviews. A commercial listing site shows a much larger and much higher figure, but directory platforms are not cited as review authorities here, so the discrepancy is recorded rather than scored. No Google Business Profile rating or review count could be verified. Since the residence address is released only after booking, a public maps listing is unlikely to exist. A pattern of six unprompted five-star reviews across six months on a young clinic's claimed profile carries no manipulation signature. It is also too small a base for confidence in either direction.
The verifiable review base is six reviews on one independent platform. Trustpilot shows 4.2 out of 5 from six reviews on a claimed profile, all of them five-star, posted between 29 January 2026 and 13 July 2026 and labelled unprompted, with no recent history of the company asking for reviews. A commercial listing site shows a much larger and much higher figure, but directory platforms are not cited as review authorities here, so the discrepancy is recorded rather than scored. No Google Business Profile rating or review count could be verified. Since the residence address is released only after booking, a public maps listing is unlikely to exist. A pattern of six unprompted five-star reviews across six months on a young clinic's claimed profile carries no manipulation signature. It is also too small a base for confidence in either direction.
The clinic publishes a press page listing favourable features in national and lifestyle titles. Of the two that could be read in full, one is bylined to Oasis Premium Recovery itself and marked as sponsored content, and the other is labelled an advertorial feature. Neither is presented as such on the clinic's press page. No bylined first-hand reporting from inside the residence was found, and the sponsorship status of the remaining items could not be established.
None claimed and none found.
A private residence in the gated Urbanizacion Rocio de Nagueles, adjoining Sierra Blanca, on the slope between the Sierra Blanca mountains and the Mediterranean. The clinic is explicit that this is a non-clinical setting: a house, not a hospital. Its own gallery shows private en-suite suites with terraces, bathrooms in natural stone, a private office, reception, several lounges and communal living areas, two gym spaces, a spa with massage and treatment rooms, a jacuzzi, a dry flotation room, a pool and terrace, and gardens. Published operational features include in-room dining, sound-dampened rooms, guest-only areas and housekeeping under quiet protocols, with entry through a private entrance reached by unbranded transfer. The gated community supplies a perimeter the clinic does not have to provide itself. Capacity remains the open question. The clinic publishes no room count, no bed count and no floor plan, and does not release the address until after booking, so none of the premises could be independently corroborated. A recreational spaces page also lists tennis, basketball and badminton courts, a cinema and a music room that the gallery does not show.
Two chefs are named on the team page, alongside a named nutritionist. Naming the kitchen at all puts this clinic ahead of most of its segment. Chef-prepared meals are included and in-room dining is available, which supports both discretion and eating-disorder work, and holistic nutritional therapy is a listed service. The nutrition work is described in practical terms: an initial mapping of meal patterns, caffeine and alcohol timing, energy dips and sleep, plans built from combinable food patterns, and weekly reviews that keep or drop changes. Faith and festival adaptation, travel strategies and routines for after discharge are covered. Laboratory decisions are explicitly left with the client's own doctor, so the plan is not built from laboratory data. Not published: any chef's culinary background or training, any dietary, allergy or micronutrient testing protocol driving the menu, any monitoring measurements during the stay, and any hygiene certification or inspection result. Dietetic input for eating disorders is explicitly brought in from outside.
shared setting
What is established: no client meets another client by appointment in an individual session, and the clinic publishes the most detailed and least rhetorical confidentiality protocol in its segment. Enquiries are logged under initials from first contact, the residence address is disclosed only after booking, transfers are unbranded and arrive at a private entrance, rooms are sound-dampened, in-room dining and guest-only areas are available, housekeeping runs under quiet protocols, staff sign confidentiality contracts with annual refresher training and defined escalation routes, records are encrypted and the clinical team is kept to a need-to-know group. The gated community adds perimeter control. What is not established: separation itself. The entry tier is sold as a shared twin room with a shared bathroom and the second tier as a private bedroom with a shared bathroom, group therapies and group sports appear among the inclusions of the residential packages, and the gallery shows shared lounges, communal terraces, two gym spaces, a spa and a pool. Other pages on the same site state that there is no group therapy and no contact with other clients. Those statements cannot all describe the same offer. Sole occupancy is sold as a separate tier, priced on application, which is the clearest available indication that it is not the standing model. The limits. No client confidentiality undertaking is published, and staff confidentiality contracts are not the same thing. Medical care delivered by third-party contracted professionals extends the confidentiality perimeter beyond the clinic's own staff. Because no regulator holds a licence that could be found for this facility, there is no external body to which a confidentiality failure would be reported and no inspection record that would surface one.
Headline basis: Public evidence, LROAS 1.0.0, edition 2026-10-01
Public-evidence total: 42
The sum of the ten criterion scores, from 10 to 100, using evidence anyone can check, including the clinic's own pages as self-declared statements. For the licence element of C2 only, it can also use an authority ruling held in our sealed evidence room. It is the only number used for the rank.
ConfidenceHow well the evidence supports the score.: medium. ProvisionalA check was still open when the edition closed, for example a register lookup or a video not yet received, or evidence under embargo.: C10.
The standard offer is a shared setting: the entry tier is sold with a shared twin room and shared bathroom, and group therapies appear among the inclusions of the residential packages, with communal lounges, terraces and dining spaces described. The therapies page says there is no group therapy, but the package pages describe what is sold, so the standard offer holds band 2. A separately sold sole-occupancy tier, in which no other clients are in the residence at any time, adds 1, giving 3. No contradiction deduction applies, because the conflict concerns group work and shared rooms rather than two capacity statements.
ConfidenceHow well the evidence supports the score.: low
A psychiatrist and a general practitioner are named, although all medical services are provided by third-party licensed professionals, and a named partner hospital gives a hospital route. No authorisation for the residence was found: the national register of health centres returned HTTP 403, so the licence element stays absent. Round-the-clock medical support is described through independent professionals without establishing overnight physician or psychiatrist cover, and no medical lead or accreditation is published. A stated psychiatrist without a licence or overnight cover gives band 4.
ConfidenceHow well the evidence supports the score.: high
Every programme opens with a detailed assessment of physical health and psychological state, dual diagnosis work begins with a comprehensive psychiatric assessment, and every residential package includes a physician's examination; the Premium Tailored intake adds a pharmacogenetic panel and nutritional assessment. No laboratory panel across the standard offer and no written diagnostic formulation are published, and the nutrition page leaves laboratory decisions to the client's own doctor. No evidence of pre-commitment clinical screening was found, so the band above is not reached.
ConfidenceHow well the evidence supports the score.: medium
The standard tiers publish three individual counselling sessions in a seven-day programme, rising to five in the upper tiers and ten in the sole-occupancy tier, while a general page claims seven to ten hours a week of one-to-one psychotherapy not tied to any package. The Essential Care tier offers a live-in counsellor only as an add-on. A dedicated team is stated only for the sole-occupancy tier, and no 24-hour clinical presence is established for the standard offer.
ConfidenceHow well the evidence supports the score.: medium
A written aftercare plan, inclusion in the fee, follow-up by the same clinical team, a secondary care apartment package, online check-ins and family-oriented support are published, with nutrition check-ins at 30, 60 and 90 days. Aftercare is described as lifetime, which is not a defined duration, no six-month structured contact is published, and medication follow-up is coordinated with independent professionals rather than delivered as psychiatric follow-up by the clinic, so the band above is not reached.
ConfidenceHow well the evidence supports the score.: medium
No ranking site is linked to the clinic, and the llms pages restate the clinic's own claims without ranking or telling a model to prefer the clinic. One violation is found: the press page lists a self-bylined article marked as sponsored content elsewhere and an advertorial feature as press coverage, with no sponsorship label. No positive signal is published: prices appear only in structured data while the visible page directs clients to admissions for pricing, and no referral-fee position or declining policy exists. One violation and no positive signal give band 3.
ConfidenceHow well the evidence supports the score.: low
Fee inclusions and exclusions, payment, deposit and refund terms, and a statement of what the clinic does not do (it does not prescribe or adjust doses) are published. Early-departure terms exist but extension fees are not stated, so that element is not met. The legal notice names only the brand and offers registration details upon request, and the terms name no entity, governing law or complaints procedure; ownership, licence reference, inspection results and a privacy notice naming a legal controller and retention are not published. No contradiction was deducted.
ConfidenceHow well the evidence supports the score.: medium
No court or regulator outcome and no open case was found for the brand, and the operating entity is not identified. No inspection record could be retrieved, the only news piece is credited to staff and describes no first-hand visit, and Trustpilot is the only independent review platform, with six reviews. With no finding and no standing element, the clinic sits in the not-published band.
ConfidenceHow well the evidence supports the score.: high
Environment has four elements: a fitness studio, pool, gardens, quiet rooms and therapy spaces, with a named partner hospital, giving 5. The residence street address is not published (area only), so the derived route to the emergency department starts from a town-level point and the emergency-route element is not met; no emergency readiness or medication policy is published. Nutrition reaches 7, with a named nutritionist and a plan built from an initial mapping of eating patterns and reviewed weekly, but no measurements. The mean of 5 and 7 is 6.
ConfidenceHow well the evidence supports the score.: medium
The team page names ten people with clinical or therapy titles but gives no credentials, registration numbers or university affiliations. The national medical college register is gated and the regional psychology register is a form-only application, so the psychiatrist's and psychologists' registrations are open lookups. The facility licence is not proven, so no provisional verification applies and no verified seniority counts.
ProvisionalA check was still open when the edition closed, for example a register lookup or a video not yet received, or evidence under embargo.: Clinician register lookups for this criterion were still open at the edition cut-off (see known_gaps). The points count as assessed on the evidence available; the band may change when the lookups are completed, which is resolved in a later edition.
ConfidenceHow well the evidence supports the score.: medium
No price appears on the clinic's own programme or package pages, and the site states that pricing is provided personally based on the programme required. A six-tier weekly ladder was recorded on those pages earlier in 2026, running from EUR 8,000 a week for Essential Care to EUR 35,000 a week for Ultimate Bespoke, with the One Client at a Time tier priced on application. Anyone comparing on cost should ask for the current figure in writing. No insurer relationship is published anywhere, so treatment should be assumed to be paid privately.
A private residence in the gated Urbanizacion Rocio de Nagueles, adjoining Sierra Blanca, in Marbella on Spain's Costa del Sol, set on the slope between the Sierra Blanca mountains and the Mediterranean. The clinic does not release the exact address until a booking is confirmed and arranges unbranded transfers to a private entrance. Malaga airport is about 45 minutes away by road and transfers are included.
People who want treatment in a five-star house rather than a clinical setting, with a heavy weighting toward individual sessions. The tier structure spans a very wide range of budgets. Be explicit about occupancy before committing: sole occupancy is sold as a separate premium package, the entry tiers are advertised with a shared bedroom or a shared bathroom, and group therapies appear among package inclusions. Anyone requiring supervised medical withdrawal should confirm the arrangements in writing, since detox is described as coordinated rather than delivered in-house.
An enquiry is followed by a private call from an admissions specialist and a discussion of options, with no obligation to proceed. Enquiries are logged under initials from first contact and a named Head of Admissions handles intake. Each programme then begins with a detailed assessment covering physical health and psychological state, and every residential package includes a full medical examination by a licensed physician. Stays run from seven days upward. No waiting time is published.
A lifetime aftercare plan and relapse prevention are listed in every residential package, with follow-up contact from the clinical team at no additional charge, online check-ins, coordination with independent licensed professionals for ongoing medication needs, and nutrition check-ins at 30, 60 and 90 days. A separately sold Secondary Care package offers a private apartment with post-residential support. No defined duration or minimum is published, and psychiatric review by the clinic after discharge is not described, so both should be established before admission.